When there was Prohibition, there were
gangsters, and the awesome movies about them. The stories of gangsters became
part of Hollywood iconography that were both romanticized and reviled their audience,
and studios like Warner Bros. were more than happy to please that audience. 1931
was a banner year for Warner Bros. with the premiere of two classic gangster
pictures, The Public Enemy and Little Caesar. Both films are
exhilarating tragedies about the rise and fall of iconic gangsters during the
Prohibition and Great Depression, infamous for their gaudy style and violence. In
The Public Enemy James Cagney plays
Tom Powers, a hotheaded brute turned prominent mob enforcer. Edward G. Robinson is Caesar Enrico “Rico”
Bandello, a common thug that becomes a made man. The are crude, mean and
irredeemable crooks, but their stories were reflective of a time where honest
hard work was simply not enough to thrive in America, which are still
compelling and resonant today.
The
biggest similarity between the Tom and Rico is that they seek prospects in “The
Big City.” Cities like New York and Chicago were both symbolic of freedom and
opportunity, but also a cesspool for organized crime run by gangsters like Al Capone
and Frank Costello, which Tom and Rico thrived in. The Public Enemy provides an epic vision of Chicago, starting with
Tom’s unruly childhood in 1909 as a petty thief and ending at the height of the
Roaring 20s. He becomes a surrogate for the audience was he witnesses firsthand
the beginning of Prohibition and his heists for newly illegalized booze. Little Caesar has more abstract
geography, at beginning Rico yearns about “going east,” rather than mention any
urban city. However like Tom, Rico gets involved with the organized crime, the
nightclubs, and he relishes it all.
Within the all the chaos of urban bustle, they found opportunity in
bootlegging booze, which is admirable in a defiant way.
Part
of why Tom and Rico find so much work is that they beat their way into the
criminal hierarchy with brutal efficiency. If there is a problem, they shoot
it. If that does not work, they shoot it again. Like corrupt Robin Hoods, their
killing sprees are touted with hero worship but there is an overt menace to their
actions. Tom may look slick with a gun and a three-piece suit but he is a rabid
dog at heart. He runs on his id,
compulsively going for any violent action if he thinks it will satisfy him. The
infamously nasty grapefruit scene only scrapes the surface of Tom's unbound cruelty.
Tom is less interested in being admired as he is in making people fear him.
When Tom finds the opportunity to get revenge on his old mentor, he savors
every moment of it. Tom torments the guy for minutes on end, making him beg and
sing in front of a piano before finally shooting him dead. The character is a
sadist at heart, but is still compelling to watch because of his childish
nature. This is in part because James Cagney’s performance is so great; he is
so good at layering greed and naivety underneath all the anger. Tom Powers is a
character know that grew up hungry and broke, and having tasted wealth he is
going would rather.
Rico
in contrast, is the more calculated with his actions. He knows perfectly well
how to manipulate the public’s opinion of him with the right news headline or
photograph while taking down his enemies. He does not even drink alcohol,
preferring instead to indulge in fashion. His cunning and knack for
presentation is most apparent after he guns down a disloyal colleague in front
of a church when word got out that he would confess to the cop. The next scene
reveals that Rico had bought the finest wreath for the man’s wake. As long as
he smiles for the camera and carries a big gun, no one will call him out... except
for Joe.
Another
key element is that Tom and Rico have friends and family that do not abide to
the gangster lifestyle, which they eventually lose. Before moving east Rico’s
closest friend Joe tells him that he is quitting the racket to become a dancer.
This disappoints Rico at first, but it progressively turns to violent jealously
once Joe falls in love with his dance partner Olga. Yet once Joe calls his
bluff Rico become powerless in an unexpected way. Rico’s love for Joe is both
his most redeeming quality and also his one weakness because once he shows
mercy, nobody is afraid of him. For Tom he has his mother, whom he dotes over, and
his straight-laced soldier brother Mike, who prefer Tom to quit while he is
ahead. To say that Tom disagrees, is an understatement. He is so temperamental
and childish that he alienates himself from his family, as well as makes
himself a target for a rival gang. By the time he asks for forgiveness, it is
too late. In 1931, redemption was saved for the comedies and romances.
Both
characters ultimately meet their ends in a similar fashion, once people start
standing up to them, the good times end and they die alone and bloody. These
are the Hollywood gangsters of 1931; the bad guys never win at the end, but at least
the best years of their lives were glamorous. They pursued their perverse ideal
of the American dream with the gusto and managed to taste the good life. It was
brief and they wind up destroying everything around them but in circumstances
like the Great Depression, it is a brilliant escape, and the audiences the
loved every moment of it. Tom and Rico some of the first in a trend of
charismatic crooks—villainous or otherwise—whose influence can be felt in films
like Bonnie & Clyde, The Godfather, and even the early The Fast and the Furious movies. They are
some irredeemably mean gangsters but they certainly made crime a fun time at
the cinema.
This
is part of The Great Villain Blogathon, which is run by Speakeasy, Silver Screenings and Shadows and Satin. Since this post is a day late (my bad) go ahead check out all of
the daily recaps here.
Excellent analysis of these two gangsters. I especially liked your description of Cagney's character, with layers of greed and naiveté.
ReplyDeleteYou're right when you say these two characters were – and still are! – hugely influential in Hollywood filmmaking. Thanks for joining the blogathon, and for bringing these two mugs with you. ;)